Unveiling the role of NK cells, NKT-like cells, and γδ cells in pathogenesis of type 1 reactions in leprosy.

Leprosy is a disease with spectral clinical manifestations along with two types of reactions, type 1 reaction (T1R) and type 2 reaction (T2R). T1R especially occurs because of the defensive upgradation of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to M. leprae antigens. T1R is the main cause of disability in leprosy. The role of conventional adaptive T cells has been well studied to understand T1R. A comprehensive understanding of the role of unconventional T cells in the manifestation of inflammation during T1R is crucial and has not been studied. In our study, we found significantly higher plasma levels of TNFα, IL1ß, IL17, and IP10 in T1R when compared to non-reaction (NR). Gene expression for cytokines in blood circulation by qPCR showed significantly higher expression of IFNγ, IP10, TNFα, IL6, IL17A and chemokines CCL3, CCR1, CCR5, and CXCR3 in T1R as compared to NR. Frequencies of NKT-like cells (48.7 %) and NK cells (22.3 %) were found significantly higher in T1R in comparison to NR (36.9 %, 18.3 %, respectively) (p = 0.0001). Significantly lower levels of γδT cells (3.32 %) were observed in T1R in comparison to NR (5.16 %). The present study has provided evidence for the first time on the role of plausible unconventional T cells in the immunopathogenesis of T1R in leprosy.

Case Report: An Atypical Case of Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis with Ulcers and Verrucous Lesions: Clinical and Therapeutic Implications.

About 75% cases of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) occur in India. Although the classic description of PKDL is the progression from initial hypopigmented macular lesions to papules to plaques and nodular lesions, atypical morphologies are also seen and are easily missed or misdiagnosed. We report a case of a 27-year-old man who presented to us with multiple acral ulcers and verrucous lesions for 5 years. A diagnosis of PKDL was made based on slit skin smear, histopathology, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The patient was given combination therapy with four doses of liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine 50 mg twice daily for 45 days. In this report, we discuss unusual morphologies of PKDL, the pathway to the diagnosis, and the therapeutic options available along with their efficacy.

Genomic characterization of Mycobacterium lepromatosis from ENL patients from India.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is caused by Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis. Both organisms cannot be cultured in vitro. M. lepromatosis was found to be associated mainly with diffuse lepromatous leprosy and with Lucio's phenomena initially. Later, M. lepromatosis was observed in borderline leprosy cases (BL), lepromatous leprosy cases (LL) and leprosy reactional cases (T1R and ENL). Although many cases are being reported with similar clinical features like Lucio phenomenon in India but M. lepromatosis was not isolated from these cases. The aim of this study was to screen MB patients and patients with type 2 reaction for the presence of M. lepromatosis. METHODOLOGY: We recruited a total of 75 multibacillary leprosy cases (45 MB cases without reaction and 30 type 2 reaction (ENL) cases) from TLM hospitals Purulia (West Bengal), Barabanki (Uttar Pradesh), Shahdara (Delhi) and PGIMER (Chandigarh), India. Punch biopsies of 5 mm were collected in 70% ethanol from all the study subjects. DNA was extracted followed by Hemi-nested PCR targeting 16S rRNA gene specific for M. lepromatosis. Further, PCR products were processed for Sanger sequencing for an absolute confirmation of M. lepromatosis. Whole genome sequencing was done to confirm the presence of M. lepromatosis. RESULT: We observed presence of M. lepromatosis in 4 necrotic ENL patients by heminested PCR. There was 100% 16S rRNA sequence similarity with M. lepromatosis FJ924 in one case, 98.96% in two cases and in one case it was 90.9% similarity by nucleotide BLAST (BLASTn) by using the NCBI website. On the basis of Sanger sequencing, we noted presence of M. lepromatosis in 3 necrotic ENL patients as one sample only gave 90.9% similarity by BLASTn. On the basis of de novo assembly and genome obtained, only one sample S4 with a 2.9 mb genome size was qualified for downstream analysis. Sixteen M. lepromatosis- specific proteins were identified in this case and the closest species was M. lepromatosis strain FJ924 based on whole genome level phylogeny. CONCLUSION: These results provide valuable insights into the prevalence of M. lepromatosis in ENL patients in different regions of India and contribute to our understanding of the genetic characteristics of this pathogen in the context of leprosy.

Assessment of Clinical, Histopathological, and Bacteriological Findings in Treated Leprosy Patients with Persistent Skin Lesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Since the introduction of multidrug therapy (MDT), various disabilities/morbidities due to leprosy have been prevented. However, there is a subset of patients in whom the skin lesions do not resolve completely or remain unchanged despite a full course of MDT, which is a great source of anxiety to the patient and their family members. Hence, we tried to ascertain the putative causes and risk factors of persistent skin lesions (PSLs) by analyzing the clinical, histopathological, bacteriological, and drug resistance patterns. This is a retrospective, cohort study wherein 35 patients who had PSLs after completion of MDT were included. The majority of the patients were 18 to 30 years of age, with males predominating. Borderline tuberculoid leprosy was the most common clinical spectrum observed (71.4%). The majority had PSLs distributed predominantly over photo-exposed sites (upper limbs > trunk > face). Eight patients (22.8%) had a history of contact with leprosy patients in their family, and six patients (17.1%) had associated comorbidities. Improvement in histopathological parameters such as a decrease in granuloma fraction was observed in 22 patients (62.8%) with PSLs after release from treatment in comparison with baseline. Four patients (11.4%) were noted to have drug resistance (three to rifampicin and one to dapsone). Thus, our study emphasizes that leprosy patients with PSLs after completion of MDT should undergo histopathological evaluation and drug resistance studies.

Effective amelioration of the Lucio phenomenon with adjuvant tofacitinib therapy in a patient with dual infection of Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis: a case report from India.

Introduction: The Lucio phenomenon (LP) is a characteristic reaction pattern seen in patients with diffuse lepromatous leprosy (DLL). Dual infection with Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis in DLL has been confirmed from other endemic countries but not previously documented from India. Conventionally, LP is treated with a high dose of systemic glucocorticoid (GC) and anti-leprosy treatment (ALT). Here we report a case of leprosy lymphadenitis at initial presentation in a patient with LP and DLL due to dual infection with M. leprae and M. lepromatosis who responded favourably to tofacitinib as adjuvant to ALT and systemic GC therapy. Case report: A 20- to 30-year-old man presented with swelling over the bilateral inguinal region, pus-filled skin lesions with multiple ulcers, fever and joint pain. Post-hospitalization investigations showed the presence of anaemia, leukocytosis, and elevated acute and chronic inflammatory markers. Skin and lymph node biopsies were suggestive of LP and leprosy lymphadenitis. The presence of M. leprae and M. lepromatosis was confirmed by PCR followed by DNA sequencing of PCR amplicons from tissue. Despite anti-leprosy treatment, oral GC and thalidomide therapy, the patient continued to develop new lesions. One month after the commencement of adjuvant tofacitinib, the patient showed excellent clinical improvement with healing of all existing lesions and cessation of new LP lesions. Conclusion: Our case confirms the presence of dual infection with M. leprae and lepromatosis in India. Lymph node involvement as an initial presentation of DLL should be considered in endemic areas. Tofacitinib may be a promising new adjuvant therapy for recalcitrant lepra reactions.

Time to revisit the purported link of leprosy reactions with infective triggers: An unnecessary economic burden for patients.

Existing literature on factors triggering leprosy reactions is based only on case reports and case series, and thus probably gives a biased view. We undertook a case-control study to investigate such purported trigger factors in 42 leprosy reaction patients and 40 non-reactional controls, and the cost of investigations required for the same. Detailed history, clinical evaluation and investigations for triggers were carried out. Infections (typhoid, dental caries) were the most common triggers found, followed by pregnancy. Trigger factors were commoner in the type 2 reaction (T2R) group compared to type 1 (T1R) reaction group. There was however no statistical difference between the two groups. The average estimated cost of investigations was higher in the reactional group and this difference was statistically significant. Hence, except for essential investigations required for initiating steroids, an extensive battery of investigations is unjustified unless the medical history suggests a definitive infective trigger.

High frequency of ofloxacin resistance patterns of Mycobacterium leprae from India: An indication to revisit second line anti-leprosy treatment regimen.

OBJECTIVES: Drug resistance in leprosy is an emerging concern, leading to treatment failures, recurrences, and potential spread of resistant Mycobacterium leprae in the community. In this study, we aimed to assess drug resistance prevalence and patterns amongst leprosy patients at a tertiary care referral hospital in India. METHODS: Mutations in drug resistance determining regions for dapsone, rifampicin, and ofloxacin of the M. leprae genome in DNA extracted from skin biopsies of 136 leprosy patients (treatment-naive = 67, with persistent skin lesions = 35, with recurrence = 34) were analysed by polymerase chain reaction followed by Sanger sequencing. Wild-type strain (Thai-53) was used as a reference strain. RESULTS: Resistance mutations were identified in a total of 23 patients, constituting 16.9% of the cohort. Within this subset of 23 cases, resistance to ofloxacin was observed in 17 individuals (12.5%), while resistance to both dapsone and rifampicin was detected in three patients each (2.2% for both). The occurrence of ofloxacin resistance showed minimal disparity between recurrent and treatment-naive cases, at 17.6% and 16.4%, respectively. Dapsone resistance emerged in two treatment-naive cases and one case with persistent skin lesions. Notably, none of the treatment-naive cases or those with recurrence/relapse exhibited rifampicin resistance. Subsequently, no statistically significant correlation was identified between other clinical variables and the presence of antimicrobial resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of resistance to the current multidrug therapy regimen (specifically dapsone and rifampicin) and to ofloxacin, a secondary antileprosy medication in M. leprae, represents a concerning scenario. This calls for an expansion towards bactericidal drug options and the establishment of robust surveillance for drug resistance in countries burdened with high leprosy rates. Moreover, the introduction of stringent antimicrobial stewardship initiatives is imperative. As a single centre study, it represents a limited, cross-sectional view of the real situation in the field.

Efficacy of fixed duration multidrug therapy for the treatment of multibacillary leprosy: A prospective observational study from Northern India.

BACKGROUND: In endemic regions of several countries, the prevalence of leprosy has not come down to the level of elimination. On the contrary, new cases are being detected in large numbers. Clinically, it is frequently noted that despite completion of multibacillary multidrug therapy for 12 months, the lesions remain active, especially in cases with high bacteriological indices. AIM: The present study focused on finding out the viable number of Mycobacterium leprae during the 12-month regimen of multibacillary multidrug therapy, at six and 12 months intervals and, attempting to determine their role in disease transmission. METHODS: Seventy eight cases of multibacillary leprosy cases were recruited from leprosy patients registered at The Leprosy Mission hospitals at Shahdara (Delhi), Naini (Uttar Pradesh) and Champa (Chhattisgarh), respectively. Slit skin smears were collected from these patients which were transported to the laboratory for further processing. Ribonucleic acid was extracted by TRIzol method. Total Ribonucleic acid was used for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (two-step reactions). A standard sample with a known copy number was run along with unknown samples for a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Patients were further assessed for their clinical and molecular parameters during 6th month and 12th month of therapy. RESULTS: All 78 new cases showed the presence of a viable load of bacilli at the time of recruitment, but we were able to follow up only on 36 of these patients for one year. Among these, using three different genes, 20/36 for esxA, 22/36 for hsp18 and 24/36 for 16S rRNA cases showed viability of M. leprae at the time of completion of 12 months of multidrug therapy treatment. All these positive patients were histopathologically active and had bacillary indexes ranging between 3+ and 4+. Patients with a high copy number of the Mycobacterium leprae gene, even after completion of treatment as per WHO recommended fixed-dose multidrug therapy, indicated the presence of live bacilli. LIMITATIONS: Follow up for one year was difficult, especially in Delhi because of the migratory nature of the population. Patients who defaulted for scheduled sampling were not included in the study. CONCLUSION: The presence of a viable load of bacilli even after completion of therapy may be one of the reasons for relapse and continued transmission of leprosy in the community.

Corroboration of cross-reactivity between Mycobacterium leprae and hosts' salivary and cutaneous proteins: A hope for prognostic biomarkers for the pathogenesis of reactions in leprosy.

Introduction: Immunological reactions are frequent complications that may occur either before, during, or after treatment and affect 30-50% of leprosy patients. The presence of autoantibodies like rheumatoid factor, antinuclear factor, and antibodies to host collagen, keratin, actin, myosin, endothelial cells, and myelin basic protein (MBP) has been earlier reported in leprosy patients. The purpose of this study was to identify cross-reactive proteins in clinical samples such as saliva and slit skin scrapings (SSS) of leprosy patients which could be utilised as prognostic biomarkers for Type 1 Reaction (T1R) in leprosy. Method: A total of 10 leprosy patients in T1R and 5 healthy volunteers were recruited. The protein was extracted from their SSS and saliva samples, thereafter, isoelectric focusing (IEF) and two-dimensional PAGE were performed to analyse the proteins. Furthermore, the cross-reactivity was identified by western blotting host proteins in gel against purified IgG from Mycobacterium leprae soluble antigen (MLSA)- hyperimmunized rabbit sera, thereafter, cross-reactive proteins were identified by MS/MS. The cross-reactive host proteins were analysed for homologous bacterial proteins and B cell epitopes (BCEs) were predicted by using bioinformatic tools. Results: A total of five spots of salivary proteins namely S100-A9, 35.3 kDa, and 41.5 kDa proteins, Serpin peptidase inhibitor (clade A), Cystatin SA-III, and four spots of SSS namely 41.4 kDa protein, Alpha-1 antitrypsin, vimentin, and keratin 1, were identified as cross-reactive. Further, a total of 22 BCEs of cross-reactive host proteins were predicted and visualised. Discussion: This data provides strong evidence of cross-reactivity/molecular mimicry between host and pathogen in leprosy patients with reaction. These BCEs of cross-reactive proteins could be further studied to predict reactions and may be utilised as an early diagnostic biomarker for T1R in leprosy.

Ofloxacin resistance in multibacillary new leprosy cases from Purulia, West Bengal: a threat to effective secondary line treatment for rifampicin-resistant leprosy cases.

OBJECTIVES: Purulia is one of the high-endemic districts for leprosy in West Bengal (the eastern part of India). The annual new case detection rate (ANCDR) of leprosy in West Bengal is 6.04/100000 (DGHS 2019-20). Our earlier report provided evidence of secondary drug resistance in relapse cases of leprosy. The aim of the current study was to observe primary drug resistance patterns for dapsone, rifampicin, and ofloxacin amongst new leprosy patients from Purulia, West Bengal in order to better understand the emergence of primary resistance to these drugs. METHODS: In the present study, slit-skin smear samples were collected from 145 newly diagnosed leprosy cases from The Leprosy Mission (TLM) Purulia hospital between 2017 and 2018. DNA was extracted from these samples and the Mycobacterium leprae genome was analyzed for genes associated with drug resistance by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by Sanger sequencing. Wild-type strain (Thai-53) and mouse footpad-derived drug-resistant strain (Z-4) were used as reference strains. RESULTS: Of 145 cases, 25 cases showed mutations in genes associated with resistance to rifampicin, dapsone, and ofloxacin (as described by the World Health Organization, rpoB, folP, and gyrA, respectively) through Sanger sequencing. Of these 25 cases, 16 cases showed mutations in ofloxacin, two cases showed mutations in combinations of ofloxacin and rifampicin, four cases showed a mutation only in rifampicin, one case showed mutations in combinations of rifampicin and dapsone, and two cases showed mutations only in dapsone. CONCLUSION: Results from this study indicated the emergence of resistance to antileprosy drugs in new cases of leprosy. As ofloxacin is the alternate drug for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant cases, the emergence of new cases with resistance to ofloxacin indicates that ofloxacin-resistant M. leprae strains are actively circulating in this endemic region (i.e., Purulia, West Bengal), posing challenges for the effective treatment of rifampicin-resistant cases.

Mimicking B and T cell epitopes between Mycobacterium leprae and host as predictive biomarkers in type 1 reaction in leprosy.

Several Mycobacterial infections including leprosy and tuberculosis are known to evoke autoimmune responses by modulating homeostatic mechanism of the host. Presence of autoantibodies like, rheumatoid factor, anti-nuclear factor and antibodies to host, collagen, keratin, myelin basic protein (MBP) and myosin, have been earlier reported in leprosy patients. In the present study, we detected the role of mimicking epitopes between Mycobacterium leprae and host components in the induction of autoimmune response in leprosy. Based on our previous findings, we predicted and synthesized a total of 15 mimicking linear B cell epitopes (BCE) and 9 mimicking linear T cell epitopes (TCE) of keratin and MBP. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against these epitopes were investigated in Non-reaction (NR), Type 1 reaction (T1R) leprosy patients, and healthy controls. We observed significantly higher levels of antibodies against 8 BCE in T1R in comparison to NR leprosy patients. Further, we also found 5 TCE significantly associated with lymphocyte proliferation in the T1R group. Our results indicated that these epitopes play a key role in the induction of autoimmune response in leprosy and are also strongly associated with the inflammatory episodes of T1R. Conclusively, these molecules may be employed as a biomarker to predict the inflammatory episodes of T1R.

Appropriately Selected Nerve in Suspected Leprous Neuropathy Yields High Positive Results for Mycobacterium leprae DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction Method.

Identification of Mycobacterium leprae DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a reliable and an affordable method to confirm leprosy. DNA from 87 nerve samples (61 from paraffin blocks and 26 fresh samples) was extracted. Mycobacterium leprae DNA was amplified by PCR from 80/87 (92%) specimens. Patients were seen over a period of 11 years (2007-2019), and leprosy was diagnosed based on clinical and characteristic histopathology findings. The clinical diagnostic possibilities were as follows: leprous neuropathy in 73/80 (91.3%), mononeuritis multiplex of unknown etiology in four (5.0%), vasculitic neuropathy in two (2.5%), and distal symmetric sensory motor neuropathy in one (1.3%). The biopsied nerves were as follows: superficial radial = 34 (42.6%), dorsal cutaneous branch of ulnar = 19 (23.8%), sural = 18 (22.5%), and superficial peroneal = 9 (11.3%), and corresponding neurological deficits were recorded in 77 (96.3%) cases. The histopathological diagnoses in total group were as follows: (borderline tuberculoid (BT) = 52, tuberculoid (TT) = 8, borderline lepromatous (BL) = 8, borderline borderline (BB) = 3, nonspecific inflammation = 3, healed/fibrosed = 4, and axonopathy = 2). Acid fast bacilli (AFB) was demonstrated in 11 (13.7%) samples. For comparison, 31 clinically and histopathologically defined non-leprous disease control nerves (inherited neuropathy = 20, vasculitis = 8, and nutritional neuropathy = 3) subjected to PCR were negative for M. leprae DNA. In most instances, there are multiple thickened peripheral nerves in suspected cases of leprosy, but neurological deficits pertaining to the thickened nerve are not as widespread. The current findings emphasize the importance of selecting the most appropriate nerve for biopsy to obtain a positive PCR result. We infer that clinical, histopathological, and PCR tests complement each other to help achieve a definitive diagnosis of leprosy particularly in pure neuritic leprosy and in leprous neuropathy with negative skin smears/biopsy.

Evidence for Mycobacterium leprae Drug Resistance in a Large Cohort of Leprous Neuropathy Patients from India.

Resistance to anti-leprosy drugs is on the rise. Several studies have documented resistance to rifampicin, dapsone, and ofloxacin in patients with leprosy. We looked for point mutations within the folP1, rpoB, and gyrA gene regions of the Mycobacterium leprae genome predominantly in the neural form of leprosy. DNA samples from 77 nerve tissue samples were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified for M leprae DNA and sequenced for drug resistance-determining regions of genes rpoB, folP1, and gyrA. The mean age at presentation and onset was 38.2 ± 13.4 (range 14-71) years and 34.9 ± 12.6 years (range 10-63) years, respectively. The majority had borderline tuberculoid leprosy (53 [68.8%]). Mutations associated with resistance were identified in 6/77 (7.8%) specimens. Mutations seen were those associated with resistance to rifampicin, ofloxacin, and dapsone. All the six patients were drug-naive. The clinical and pathological manifestations in this group did not differ from the drug-sensitive group. This study highlights the occurrence of resistance to the standard multidrug therapy and ofloxacin in leprosy. Among the entire cohort, 1/77 (1.3%) showed resistance to rifampicin, 2/77 (2.6%) to dapsone, and 5/77 (6.4%) to ofloxacin. Six new patients showing infection by mutant strains indicated the emergence of primary resistance. Resistance to ofloxacin could be due to frequent use of quinolones for many bacterial infections. The results of the study indicate the need for development of a robust and strict surveillance system for detecting drug resistance in leprosy in India.

Utility of multiplex PCR for early diagnosis and household contact surveillance for leprosy.

Early diagnosis of leprosy is important for limiting the severity of disease, which may lead to disabilities and deformities if not treated timely. Multiplex PCR employing more than one gene, specific to target DNA, is more efficient detection tool. In the present study, slit skin scrapings, blood, nasal swabs and saliva from Paucibacillary (PB) and Multibacillary (MB) cases as well as household contacts of PB cases were tested by multiplex PCR using three different gene targets namely RLEP, 16SrRNA and sodA. We found an increase in overall diagnostic positivity for M. leprae DNA detection by M-PCR as compared to individual PCR. In case of nasal swabs using M-PCR the PPV, NPV were 0.5454, 0.8333 respectively. There is remarkable increase in PPV in SSS of PB cases and nasal swabs of HHCs using M-PCR. Conclusively, our finding suggests the utility of M-PCR for early diagnosis and household contact surveillance for leprosy.